[maemo-developers] The Summit: Git/Gitorious - Untracked talks: consider adding them...
From: David Greaves david at dgreaves.comDate: Fri Sep 4 16:08:22 EEST 2009
- Previous message: The Summit: Git/Gitorious - Untracked talks: consider adding them...
- Next message: The Summit: Git/Gitorious - Untracked talks: consider adding them...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
First off, I hope this didn't come across as insisting or complaining - I tried to express that. Maybe 'mistake' was wrong - I just carried on writing :) As much as anything I wanted to open discussions as to how important people felt DVCS is. For me it's crucial for Mer and Qt - maybe not so much for others? Jamie Bennett wrote: > Please see my comments in-line below. > > On Fri, 2009-09-04 at 12:57 +0100, David Greaves wrote: >> I proposed a talk at the summit on DVCS and git and it has not been accepted by >> the talk selection group. This isn't a complaint :) . . . . . however I >> do worry that it might be a mistake... what do you think? > > Its good to bring any doubts about the selection process out to a wider > audience, thanks. I'll try to explain why _I_ voted a no (although it > wasn't a definite no, see below). > > You have another talk, "An Alternative to Autobuilder/Scratchbox" which > would be a talk, in your own words, "about the processes around Mer > builds, access controls, managing integration with our DVCS (git), > acceleration tricks and generally how to make good use of things you > find lying about on the web." > > Now I see this as overlapping somewhat with the DVCS talk and my > suggestion was to combine the two to give a higher level but more > complete picture of development with the current tools we have. Yes, I'll certainly do that. > But does this admiral goal translate well to a presentation or something > else? > > I see this not as a presentation, but more of a collaborative effort > with like-minded individuals hence I suggest a BOF. We have a lot of > physical space at the Summit. I'm sure we can get room for a BOF session > on DVCS practices with the results presented in a lightening talk the > next day and reported on the wiki. How does that sound? I kinda don't know how things are being set out - that sounds really good though - maybe we can do a lightning talks beforehand to set the scene too (and encourage attendance)? Still interested in developer comments about DVCS processes too - what areas (if any!) are of interest - if there's no interest then maybe it's not worth worrying about. David -- "Don't worry, you'll be fine; I saw it work in a cartoon once..."
- Previous message: The Summit: Git/Gitorious - Untracked talks: consider adding them...
- Next message: The Summit: Git/Gitorious - Untracked talks: consider adding them...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]