[maemo-developers] How to use extras-testing correctly?
From: Aniello Del Sorbo anidel at gmail.comDate: Thu Sep 24 13:56:34 EEST 2009
- Previous message: How to use extras-testing correctly?
- Next message: How to use extras-testing correctly?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
2009/9/24 Niels Breet <niels at maemo.org>: > On Thu, September 24, 2009 12:07, Henrik Hedberg wrote: >> Niels Breet wrote: >> >> >>> On Thu, September 24, 2009 11:19, Aniello Del Sorbo wrote: >>> >>>> Here's my proposal: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> We leave Extras-Testing as it is, with votes, comments, bug reports >>>> an so on (or improve it, as you wish). But then it's only the >>>> developer that decides, based on that feedback, if or not to promote >>>> the application to Extras. >>>> >>>> >>> This is what happens now. Even if your app gets enough votes for >>> promotion to Extras, you still need to push the button. There is no >>> automatic promotion. >>> >>> The developer/maintainer is always the one who decides on when to >>> publish the app. >> >> So no quarantine, no need to gather karma points? Please, update the >> wiki [1], if that will be the case. > > No, but the developer can decide to leave the app in extras-testing. > >> >> Aniello was saying that developer should have an option to promote >> his application directly into extras regardless of the extras-testing QA. I >> second to that. >> > > This is what we had in diablo and this clearly didn't work. > In Diablo we hadn't any feedback from extras-devel. There was no infrastructure like Extras Testing there. > The whole idea about this QA testing is to prevent the wild west > brokenness we had before. Sure it is not perfect, we can shape it > gradually. > That's why I love it. > Remember that this is still beta, nothing is perfect in the first release. > That's exactly what I am doing. -- anidel Sent from London, Eng, United Kingdom
- Previous message: How to use extras-testing correctly?
- Next message: How to use extras-testing correctly?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]