[maemo-developers] proper icon path
From: David King davidk at openismus.comDate: Wed Apr 7 15:25:58 EEST 2010
- Previous message: proper icon path
- Next message: proper icon path
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 2010-04-06 15:35, Stefanos Harhalakis <v13 at v13.gr> wrote: >On Tuesday 06 of April 2010, daniel wilms wrote: >> ext Stefanos Harhalakis wrote: >> > I'm currently using /usr/share/icons/hicolor/64x64/apps/, but I see other >> > applications using /usr/share/icons/hicolor/64x64/hildon, or even >> > /usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable/apps and >> > /usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable/hildon. >> > >> > Is there a "proper" location or is everything acceptable? >> >> The proper location for the icons is in: >> >> /usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable/hildon/ > >Thank you for clarifying that. > >Is there a reason why "scalable" was chosen? AFAIK for desktop systems this is >supposed to hold "scalable" graphics like SVGs while bitmaps icons are >supposed to go under /usr/share/icons/hicolor/AxB/ (AxB being the dimension) >(or perhaps I know wrong). I would also like to know this, as I was going to edit a few wiki pages that mention install locations for icons. However, all the locations above seem to work just fine (I tested with a few applications), and the freedesktop.org icon naming specification suggests that ‘apps’ is the correct subdirectory to use: http://standards.freedesktop.org/icon-naming-spec/icon-naming-spec-latest.html#context Daniel, is /usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable/hildon/ the canonical location for all application icons on Fremantle, and if so, where is this documented? -- David King | http://amigadave.com/ | davidk at openismus.com
- Previous message: proper icon path
- Next message: proper icon path
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]