[maemo-developers] MeeGo
From: Jamie Bennett jamie at linuxuk.orgDate: Mon Feb 15 18:24:56 EET 2010
- Previous message: MeeGo
- Next message: MeeGo
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 15 Feb 2010, at 16:21, Thomas Tanner wrote: > On 15.02.10 16:47, Jeremiah Foster wrote: >>> The problem is more complex than converting binary .debs to .rpms >>> using a hack. >> alien is not a hack. > > the hack referes to a process ignoring the issues listed below. No > automated process can take into account all the distribution and program > specific quirks. > >>> The dependencies, the build script and Debian (ucf, debconf) or >>> Maemo (maemo-optify) specific aspects of the sources would need to >>> be adapted as well. Backporting to Maemo5 would also be more >>> difficult. >> >>> Who benefits more from the merger, Moblin or Maemo? >> Both benefit if we get the kind of scale that is imagined. > > I'm not critising the merger itself, but how and what is merged > and whether that are top-down decisions or whether the community is > involved. > > AFAIK there a hardly any Moblin specific third-party apps. > It could be much less effort to integrate the Moblin components > in a Debian based system than converting all Maemo apps to Moblin/RPM. Its already been done with the Ubuntu Moblin Remix. (Disclaimer, I work for Canonical who did the Moblin Remix). > Thomas Tanner ------ Regards, Jamie. -- http://www.linuxuk.org
- Previous message: MeeGo
- Next message: MeeGo
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]