[maemo-developers] MeeGo
From: Thomas Tanner tanner at gmx.deDate: Mon Feb 15 20:00:16 EET 2010
- Previous message: MeeGo
- Next message: RPM vs. Deb (was Re: MeeGo)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 15.02.10 17:55, Christopher Intemann wrote: > Since MeeGo is about to become the successor of Maemo, I guess there > won't be any need to backport anything. such an attitude would make lots of N900 and N8x0 owners angry... > I guess that rpm is just more advanced than deb. this is wrong, but not relevant here. The package format itself is negligible. The important point is the infrastructure it implies. According to http://www.desktoplinux.com/news/NS2068665492.html Moblin switched from Ubuntu to Fedora because "RPM offers the advantage of containing license information" (I don't whether that's the only or main reason). But .debs have the license information in their doc directory (most of them are DFSG free anyway) and it could be added as X-License field of the package description, if necessary. I don't want a platform that is merely a Qt runtime enviroment (Symbian would be sufficient) but one which also offers me easy access to the complete GNU/Linux software world. Debian based distributions have offered working ARM ports for years but Fedora does not. Porting Moblin/Fedora to ARM would be lots of duplicated effort, using Maemo/Debian on X86 or ARM is for free. On 15.02.10 17:57, Dieter Plaetinck wrote: > PS: I have no idea of moblin's size, so maybe you make a good point. I > don't know. I could only find those standard GNOME applications http://garage.moblin.org/garage/all?page=1 -- Thomas Tanner ------ email: tanner at gmx.de GnuPG: 1024/5924D4DD
- Previous message: MeeGo
- Next message: RPM vs. Deb (was Re: MeeGo)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]