[maemo-developers] RPM Vs. Deb (Was Re: MeeGo)
From: Jean-Christian de Rivaz jc at eclis.chDate: Tue Feb 16 16:30:54 EET 2010
- Previous message: RPM Vs. Deb (Was Re: MeeGo)
- Next message: TreeView with variable height rows?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Fathi Boudra a écrit : > That's pure speculation but it's the only rationale I found so far > about the rpm choice. > > Quoting from a lwn.net comment: > > --- > reference: http://www.desktoplinux.com/news/NS2068665492.html: > Hohndel was quoted as saying that the move to Fedora was largely a > "technical decision based on the desire to adopt RPM (Red Hat Package > Manager) for package management" instead of Ubuntu's Debian DEB > extension. RPM offers the advantage of containing license information, > Hohndel was said to have noted, thereby enabling developers to create > collections of software by license type or exclude software by license > type. > --- > reference: http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Nj... > "One of the examples cited by Dirk was the ability for RPMs to easily > identify the license of packages and being able to build an environment > including or excluding a particular license type." > --- This is pointless. Debian package can contain license information if you want to. Please read the chapter "5.7 User-defined fields": http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html Adding just a "XBS-License:" line in each package control file do not justify to lose 5 years of work. Regards, Jean-Christian de Rivaz
- Previous message: RPM Vs. Deb (Was Re: MeeGo)
- Next message: TreeView with variable height rows?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]