[maemo-developers] MeeGo
From: Stuart Anderson anderson at netsweng.comDate: Tue Feb 16 17:01:13 EET 2010
- Previous message: MeeGo
- Next message: MeeGo
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tue, 16 Feb 2010, Jeremiah Foster wrote: > > On Feb 16, 2010, at 3:00 PM, Stuart Anderson wrote: > >> On Tue, 16 Feb 2010, Jeremiah Foster wrote: >>> >>> I highly doubt the Linux Foundation is going to go back on the Linux Standards Base and use .debs, but I do like your optimism. :) >> >> Not that the LSB only specified the RPM package format. This was done because >> most distributions had a way of handling RPM packages (Debian uses alien). >> >> The LSB does NOT mandate that the distro itself has to use RPM, only that it >> be capable of correclty installing an application packaged with RPM. Debian >> is LSB compliant, so any other .deb based distro should be capable of doing >> the same. >> >> Wanting to be LSB conforming does not imply that a distro must be RPM based. > > Of course you are right. But be honest, do you really think these two companies are going to expend effort on supporting an apt based package manager? Do you think they are going to document using apt with rpms? Do you think they will advise new users and their own internal developers to use debs instead of rpm? Absolutely not. This is clearly a case of these 3 entities serving their own interests over those of the community. I just wanted to point out that any reasoning based on "because the LSB says so" was invalid. Stuart Stuart R. Anderson anderson at netsweng.com Network & Software Engineering http://www.netsweng.com/ 1024D/37A79149: 0791 D3B8 9A4C 2CDC A31F BD03 0A62 E534 37A7 9149
- Previous message: MeeGo
- Next message: MeeGo
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]