[maemo-developers] FatELF Re: rpm vs. deb and "universal binaries/packages"
From: David Greaves david at dgreaves.comDate: Wed Feb 17 19:19:09 EET 2010
- Previous message: FatELF Re: rpm vs. deb and "universal binaries/packages"
- Next message: FatELF Re: rpm vs. deb and "universal binaries/packages"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andrew Flegg wrote: > FatELF or some new extensions to an existing packaging format would be > wonderful if having users install random binaries from random > locations on the Internet was a useful requirement. ie virus heaven I have to agree wholeheartedly. FatELF is totally inappropriate for Meego/Maemo (and IMHO most Linux distros). I'd say thanks for suggesting it, now let it die :) David -- "Don't worry, you'll be fine; I saw it work in a cartoon once..."
- Previous message: FatELF Re: rpm vs. deb and "universal binaries/packages"
- Next message: FatELF Re: rpm vs. deb and "universal binaries/packages"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]