[maemo-developers] maemo-developers Digest, Vol 58, Issue 19

[From: acano at dsic.upv.es]

About this discussion. Personally I think that working on Qt instead  
of Java is a very good choice. It is less portable, but much more  
efficient.

Regards,

A. Cano

> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:01:43 +0100
> From: Kees Jongenburger <kees.jongenburger at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: MeeGo
> To: Carlos Morgado <cchhbbmm at gmail.com>
> Cc: maemo-developers at maemo.org
> Message-ID:
> 	<e5e16331002180201x3b4819cay388d14bce3401c95 at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> Hi Carlos,
>
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 11:49 PM, Carlos Morgado <cchhbbmm at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Honestly, I'll won't even bother with MeeGo 'till I see products and a
>> decent roadmap. Meanwhile Nokia must just change it's mind, buy some GUI
>> toolkit in Java and decide that's the way to go, go back to Symbian or just
>> fold. Nobody knows.
>
> I disagree on most you say but do not on the Java part. Java would
> IMHO given enough security, portability and ease of development in a
> way that doesn't cost to much effort. the Current Maemo will already
> be very hard to scale down(cost of hardware) that that is what you
> need if you want to sell many devices.
>
> Greetings
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 12:30:47 +0200
> From: "Ville M. Vainio" <vivainio at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: MeeGo
> To: Kees Jongenburger <kees.jongenburger at gmail.com>
> Cc: maemo-developers at maemo.org
> Message-ID:
> 	<46cb515a1002180230k38e9710cq3956802425212c85 at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Kees Jongenburger
> <kees.jongenburger at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I disagree on most you say but do not on the Java part. Java would
>> IMHO given enough security, portability and ease of development in a
>> way that doesn't cost to much effort. the Current Maemo will already
>> be very hard to scale down(cost of hardware) that that is what you
>> need if you want to sell many devices.
>
> So we would make it run better on low-powered devices by slapping a
> virtual machine in between? Intuitively, that doesn't feel quite
> right.
>
> --
> Ville M. Vainio
> http://tinyurl.com/vainio
>
>
> ------------------------------
>

----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.