[maemo-developers] No subject

[From:]

judge differently. For me quality is not that an app doesn't crash or
break things, but that it looks nice, spelling is good, it works
efficiently and quickly, etc.

> Notice that the current extras-testing QA requirements are quite low:
> 
> 1. [ ] Bug database exist.
> 
> Annoying, but not hard to add (particularly if you choose a 
> tmo thread 
> instead of bugzilla).
> 
> 2. [ ] Licensing ok.
> 3. [ ] No illegal/dubious content.
> 
> Yep, no piracy is acceptable.
> 
> 4. [ ] Working provided features.
> 
> Yep. crashing apps are bad.
> 
> 5. [ ] No missing announced features.
> 
> If something doesn't work (yet), don't advertize it. Don't 
> dissapoint users.
> 
> 6. [ ] Optification ok.
> 
> Should we start accepting packages that break SSUs ?
> 
> 7. [ ] No performance problems.
> 8. [ ] No power management issues.
> 
> This could be clarified to belong only to always-running apps 
> (such as 
> hildon-desktop plugins).
> 
> 9. [ ] No known security risks.
> 
> This is a bit sketchy, but certainly allowing things like "default 
> password ssh server" would be very very bad for endusers.

I wouldn't call these things the quality of an app, and I think using
that word is rather misleading. But anyway we're all still singing from
the same hymn sheet, so that's good.

Cheers,


Simon