[maemo-developers] Maemo extras repository package uploader/maintainer verification?
From: Jeremiah Foster jeremiah at jeremiahfoster.comDate: Fri Jan 22 17:03:48 EET 2010
- Previous message: Maemo extras repository package uploader/maintainer verification?
- Next message: Maemo extras repository package uploader/maintainer verification?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Jan 22, 2010, at 2:19 PM, Ed Bartosh wrote: > 2010/1/22 Andrew Flegg <andrew at bleb.org>: >> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:59, Simon Pickering <S.G.Pickering at bath.ac.uk> wrote: >>> >>> I'd suggest that the autobuilder checks to see that the uploader's email >>> address is included in one of the *Maintainer fields; but there is the >>> slight problem of what happens when someone is uploading someone else's >>> package (e.g. as a favour when they are away from a build machine)? >> >> There's also packages which are maintained by a team but uploaded by >> an individual. >> > And there are also packages taken from Debian/Ubuntu and uploaded > without any change. > I don't think we should stop them from coming. It's possible to find > real uploader name in autobuilder logs and might be in the /packages > web UI as well. > Bringing new checks like this to the system wouldn't make entrance > barrier lower for newcomers. I agree. We should not allow packages uploaded to the repos without a corresponding, correct email address. Unfortunately I think a lot of packages uploaded by Nokia do not use the correct Maemo Policy recommendation, which is to change the maintainer name and email address. I wouldn't like to block the upload of libraries that are key dependencies so I don't think we should flip this switch yet - but it definitely will produce a warning. Jeremiah
- Previous message: Maemo extras repository package uploader/maintainer verification?
- Next message: Maemo extras repository package uploader/maintainer verification?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]