[maemo-developers] Is mauku open source, i.e free or is in non-free?
From: Graham Cobb g+770 at cobb.uk.netDate: Tue Jan 26 22:13:31 EET 2010
- Previous message: Is mauku open source, i.e free or is in non-free?
- Next message: Is mauku open source, i.e free or is in non-free?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tuesday 26 January 2010 19:30:25 Carsten Munk wrote: > Maybe a worthwhile discussion for Council to get into as well, this > particular license does say you are not allowed to redistribute the > Mauku source code from maemo.org (or anywhere). As a member of the Council I would say that we need to somewhere make it clear that by uploading a source package to maemo.org, you are giving maemo.org a licence to redistribute that source and the binaries built from it (and that you assert you have the right to give such a licence). Shall we add that to http://wiki.maemo.org/Extras? That would protect maemo.org but does nothing to stop non-free software going into free. > My personal view would be seperating it at OSD definition as history > shows us we might have to watch out for what software we distribute > from maemo.org as it opens the community to C&D's. As a member of the community, my view is that we should clearly adopt one of the standard definitions of open source. I don't particularly care whether we adopt the OSD or some other definition. For practical reasons (as we are based on Debian) I would suggest adopting "the Debian DFSG as defined by the Debian Social Contract and operated by the Debian project". In practice that is identical to OSD I believe but it would mean we can rely on the debian-legal determinations when they exist (and, in particular, we can re-use anything from Debian's free section). Graham
- Previous message: Is mauku open source, i.e free or is in non-free?
- Next message: Is mauku open source, i.e free or is in non-free?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]