[maemo-developers] Where are the N900 "too much time at 600Mhz" safeguards?
From: Javier S. Pedro maemo at javispedro.comDate: Thu Jan 28 00:43:11 EET 2010
- Previous message: gtk_label_set_markup issue
- Next message: Where are the N900 "too much time at 600Mhz" safeguards?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
When I got my N900, one of the first things I noticed is that (as measured by powertop) I could never get a 100% ratio at 600 Mhz, but more like 95%. I quickly assumed this was the safeguard for the issue Igor Stoppa talked about at the Maemo Summit. However, I've noticed today (as suggested by a tmo post) that the above is not caused by any special modification in the kernel, but rather because of the CPU idling while waiting for the SGX / some other hw (so, testing methodology failure on my part :) ). Thus, given any task bounded by raw CPU throughput, the device will happily clock itself at 600Mhz, even for hours. Doesn't that contradict what Igor said at the summit? -- Javier
- Previous message: gtk_label_set_markup issue
- Next message: Where are the N900 "too much time at 600Mhz" safeguards?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]