[maemo-developers] Quality assurance of "stable" software: my battery drained in few hours
From: Ian Stirling maemo-devel at mauve.plus.comDate: Sun Jun 6 20:20:11 EEST 2010
- Previous message: Quality assurance of "stable" software: my battery drained in few hours
- Next message: Quality assurance of "stable" software: my battery drained in few hours
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Robin Burchell wrote: > On Sun, Jun 6, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Ian Stirling <maemo-devel at mauve.plus.com> wrote: >>> It's pretty hard to find out what's eating the battery on N900. First you >>> have decide that the battery is being consumed too fast. The default charge >>> meter occasionally realizes it's very wrong, and rapidly readjusts itself, >>> giving potential misreadings there. bq27200 certainly helps there, though >>> there's no "production quality" software available to use it yet. Nokia >>> Energy Profiler still shines with its absence ;) >> I'm trying to develop something like this. >> An energy profiler. >> >> The ideal would be 'top' - sorted by power use. >> But this is hard. :) > > You mean, like, powertop? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PowerTOP No, fairly unlike powertop. Powertop sorts by wakeups, which is not useless. Consider a compute intensive task that uses 99.95% of the CPU. At the same time, you've got a lightweight task that polls some descriptor 10 times a second. This will appear above the application that's really causing most battery drain. Powertops metric - wakeups per second - is arguably for some loads better than top, but it can be horribly misleading for a number of reasons.
- Previous message: Quality assurance of "stable" software: my battery drained in few hours
- Next message: Quality assurance of "stable" software: my battery drained in few hours
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]