[maemo-developers] External Repository and HAM
From: Thomas Perl th.perl at gmail.comDate: Mon Mar 8 14:42:46 EET 2010
- Previous message: External Repository and HAM
- Next message: External Repository and HAM
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
2010/3/8 Marius Vollmer <marius.vollmer at nokia.com>: > ext Benoît HERVIER <khertan at khertan.net> writes: >> The purpose is to migrate my softwares from "extras" to my own >> repository as i ll not push anymore my applications to extras, but >> only on my own repository. > > Ahh, ok. This is not something that is well supported (as you have > found out), and I believe the Maemo community discourages this. Maybe > there is a possibilty for you to keep your package in Extras? I have a similar problem. If the Maemo community wants developers to publish their packages in Maemo Extras, please make sure that problems with the autobuilder are dealt with in a reasonable time frame. I haven't published a new version of MaePad in Extras for nearly a month now, because of autobuilder issues (with sharing-dialog-dev): https://bugs.maemo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9070 In the mean time, several new versions have been published, and I'm distributing binary .debs on the MaePad homepage, which is not an optimal solution. I don't know if Khertan's problem is technical or political, but please try to fix the technical problems with the Extras repository, or even more developers will create their own repos again (think gronmayer.com), and because of the "trust domain" issue, this might result in several people requesting to have their packages pulled from Extras in order to be able to distribute their packages from another repo (it also means that less packages go through Extras-Testing / the Extras QA Queue). I guess this is not what the community wants, right? Thomas
- Previous message: External Repository and HAM
- Next message: External Repository and HAM
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]