[maemo-developers] Extras-testing improvements
From: Graham Cobb g+770 at cobb.uk.netDate: Tue Mar 9 13:38:31 EET 2010
- Previous message: Extras-testing improvements
- Next message: Extras-testing improvements
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Tuesday 09 March 2010 09:42:05 Niels Breet wrote: > You have to see that Extras should be for applications that are of a high > quality. Absolutely not. I completely disagree. Extras is the home for the wonderful creativity of the Maemo community. It is for all apps: the good, the bad, the ugly. It is the place for our new members, just starting, who want somewhere to publish their first try at creating an app. It is the place for our major success stories. It is the place for the niche app with fewer than 20 users in the world. It is the place for the next unexpected success story. > The Extras repository should not give any problems to people who > are new to Maemo and have no clue how to work with linux for instance. Sure, we want a process which can **help** developers improve and avoid problems. But the best way for new developers to learn is to publish their app and get feedback from real users. Then they will understand the advice better. > For Extras we really should aim for having end-user ready apps. We haven't > been too strict about it, but we as a community should try to be on the > same level as, or above Ovi ;) I completely disagree. Ovi can remain as a highly controlled channel. Extras is about unrestricted creativity, which includes good and bad. > > If applications are ugly or not completely working (but still not > > harmful), I'd like them to have a bad rating, of course, but still be > > available on Extras. > > I'm not sure about this. I think we need to grow up a bit and aim for > something better than 'it works'. A way to find high quality apps should be layered on top of Extras. My view is that this should be a web tool, on maemo.org, maybe with something like Daniel's app as an on-device UI. As Extras gets bigger and bigger, people will move away from using HAM, with its massive lists in alphabetical order, as the way to find apps and will want something better. That is the place to allow them to find the higher quality apps out of Extras. Meanwhile, if someone on Talk tells them about a neat app in Extras they can still use HAM to install it, in the confidence that it might be crap but it won't break their device. Graham
- Previous message: Extras-testing improvements
- Next message: Extras-testing improvements
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]