[maemo-developers] Extras-testing improvements

From: Attila Csipa maemo at csipa.in.rs
Date: Tue Mar 9 14:49:12 EET 2010
On Tuesday 09 March 2010 13:19:33 Simon Pickering wrote:
> > Also, the idea that an application can both be "low quality" and "end
> > user ready" is a bizarre.
>
> I completely agree with Graham Cobb here, Extras should contain apps
> that work no matter how pretty or poorly spelled they are.

To repeat myself, this is not really the issue here. Some testers might get 
carried away (at which point they need to be corrected), but the testing 
guidelines are quite clear about certain things being blockers, and others 
(like aforementioned spelling and general prettiness) not. There are 
borderline cases (like icons, bugtrackers, etc) but still, those are just 
shades of gray, they do not change the process fundamentally.

Regards,
Attila
More information about the maemo-developers mailing list