[maemo-developers] Extras-testing improvements
From: Tim Teulings rael at edge.ping.deDate: Tue Mar 9 15:06:20 EET 2010
- Previous message: Extras-testing improvements
- Next message: Extras-testing improvements
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hello! > myself. But poor quality applications reflect badly on maemo.org > community as well. Do you want to be part of a community which is known Right. But for this we have rating and another repository does not really help solving this. If this results in extras containing 100 5 star rated applications and 10000 one star rated applications in some other extras-authors repository Nokia is not not happy either. Who is to blame? If on the other hand if the repository is full of one star rated application who is to blame, too ;-)? Another repository is just hiding things but it does not make applications better or the repository containing more applications (which seem to be unsurpising interests in extras). As Graham stated there are other ways required to improve this. > for its low quality standards? Notice that the current extras-testing QA > requirements are quite low: I agree. I don't thing that the requirements are a real problem. But the current process seems sub-optimal. Possibly the goal of the extras repository has to be clearified (not changed!). If the process gets simpler we may even be able to add further checks (not blockers). I especially would be interested in automatic tests if possible. -- Gruß... Tim
- Previous message: Extras-testing improvements
- Next message: Extras-testing improvements
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]