[maemo-developers] Building Maemo OS from Source.

[From: Ryan Abel]

On Mar 19, 2010, at 5:50 PM, <Igor.Stoppa at nokia.com> <Igor.Stoppa at nokia.com> wrote:

> From: ext Ryan Abel [rabelg5 at gmail.com]
> Sent: 19 March 2010 23:43
> 
>> Will it be advertised as such? Wording I've seen so far leads me to believe it'll be advertised as "MeeGo" not "MeeGo-compliant". I guess we'll have to wait and see.
> 
> Anyway why wouldn't "MeeGo" be correct if it is contained in the device? I could understand the argument if some MeeGo component was to be replaced, but if it is extanded or if some gap (platform specific) is filled by a non-MeeGo component, I see no real problem or miscommunication.

Well, in Harmattans case, because it aint MeeGo at all. For anything else, well, I don't know. Until we know exactly how much of the platform is actually "MeeGo" it's impossible to say. But judging by the amount of differentiation I know Nokia likes to keep, it's going to be incredibly confusing to both users and developers.