[maemo-developers] Quality assurance of "stable" software: my battery drained in few hours
From: Sivan Greenberg sivan at omniqueue.comDate: Sun May 30 11:30:38 EEST 2010
- Previous message: Quality assurance of "stable" software: my battery drained in few hours
- Next message: Quality assurance of "stable" software: my battery drained in few hours
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Stuck could be deduced for example when the process is in more then 90% CPU for more than a threshold duration that we will predetermine and being idle on its I/O streams. Sivan On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Daniil Ivanov <daniil.ivanov at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Sivian! > > How do you define the stuck? It's Ok for the process to consume >90% > of CPU time for short > period of time. > > Thanks, Daniil. > > On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Sivan Greenberg <sivan at omniqueue.com> wrote: >> Hey Daniil, >> >> If a process is stuck in and awakened , and consumes more then a >> $PERDEFINED % of cpu, and it's output and input streams are idle, then >> I'd say we need to seriously consider killing it. >> >> Sivan >> >> On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 11:07 AM, Daniil Ivanov <daniil.ivanov at gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hi Silvan! >>> >>> In these terms GPS and WiFi are also maligant. How kernel or >>> anything else could >>> know what is reasonable power consumption for a process? >>> >>> Thanks, Daniil. >>> >>> On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 10:49 PM, Sivan Greenberg <sivan at omniqueue.com> wrote: >>>> Actually, I would think the kernel should already do something like that... >>>> >>>> On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 10:48 PM, Sivan Greenberg <sivan at omniqueue.com> wrote: >>>>> Doesn't the userland carry some sort of process monitoring, killing >>>>> malignant processes ? If not, we should develop something like this >>>>> for MeeGo. >>>>> >>>>> Sivan >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 10:44 PM, Aniello Del Sorbo <anidel at gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 29 May 2010 10:03, Andrea Grandi <a.grandi at gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 29 May 2010 19:02, Ian <vern at riseup.net> wrote: >>>>>>> > Hi >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >> I went to sleep at 3:00, I wake up few minutes ago with the N900 >>>>>>> >> powered off. There was not any active connection when I went to sleep, >>>>>>> >> so could anyone please explain me WHO drained my whole battery?! >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Bluetooth? I'd check that >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I never use it >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Is this a freshly flashed N900? >>>>>> Or did you restore from a backup? >>>>>> I had mine died yesterday in half a day because a process (I think >>>>>> intellisync or something like that) was stuck somehow somewhere. >>>>>> I have mine from a restored backup. Sure I wanted it to be stable after a >>>>>> restore, but sometimes old config files/settings/whatever cause unexpected >>>>>> (quite impossible to catch in testing) behaviors. >>>>>> -- >>>>>> anidel >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> maemo-developers mailing list >>>>>> maemo-developers at maemo.org >>>>>> https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> maemo-developers mailing list >>>> maemo-developers at maemo.org >>>> https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers >>>> >>> >> >
- Previous message: Quality assurance of "stable" software: my battery drained in few hours
- Next message: Quality assurance of "stable" software: my battery drained in few hours
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]