[maemo-developers] Maemo -> MeeGo migration (was Re: maemo.org team meeting Tuesday the 14th?)
From: Michael Cronenworth mike at cchtml.comDate: Wed Sep 8 17:27:52 EEST 2010
- Previous message: Maemo -> MeeGo migration (was Re: maemo.org team meeting Tuesday the 14th?)
- Next message: Maemo -> MeeGo migration (was Re: maemo.org team meeting Tuesday the 14th?)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andrew Flegg wrote: > http://lists.meego.com/pipermail/meego-dev/2010-September/005525.html This is very sad. I see nothing has changed since I left the MeeGo lists. Having static packages is so 2000! A MeeGo foundation should be to have all packages in upstream MeeGo repositories instead of 3rd party repo after 3rd party repo. Endorsing 3rd party repos is a recipe for fail. If they want to follow the success that is Android or iOS they should be welcoming a central/official set of repositories. > > However, it seems that Intel& Nokia in their ivory towers Yes, this is why I left the MeeGo lists. The talk about having an open process and open operating environment was just that. Talk. I think Stallman got paid off big time to not cause a big fuss about the way MeeGo is being handled when they were given the FSF logo to place on meego.com.
- Previous message: Maemo -> MeeGo migration (was Re: maemo.org team meeting Tuesday the 14th?)
- Next message: Maemo -> MeeGo migration (was Re: maemo.org team meeting Tuesday the 14th?)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]