[maemo-developers] MADDE 'developer' account - good or bad?
From: Attila Csipa maemo at csipa.in.rsDate: Wed Sep 22 15:30:39 EEST 2010
- Previous message: MADDE 'developer' account - good or bad?
- Next message: MADDE 'developer' account - good or bad?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Ville M. Vainio <vivainio at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Attila Csipa <maemo at csipa.in.rs> wrote: > > > If there are no components that work with hardcoded usernames od > uid/gids, > > that would roughly be it (for files, which are the most common problem > > IIUC). Services/daemons might get tricky but I suppose that is not a > nearly > > as common scenario. > > One-time copy can also be problematic if you are mutating the data in > real time as 'user' while running a program (that is interested in the > same data) as 'developer'. > > This is not an entirely unrealistic use case. > > Also, developer would be on separate dbus session bus from 'user' (UUIC). > > Considering all of this, I'm inclined to wish we had a "I know what > I'm using, please run this app as 'user'|" checkbox in Nokia Qt SDK. > > Hey, I'm always for options :) But the point is that a non-destructive way of playing with data would be nice - with a little tweaking with su and friends you can make it run as 'user' anyway, right ? Best regards, Attila -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.maemo.org/pipermail/maemo-developers/attachments/20100922/7fb1dd15/attachment.htm>
- Previous message: MADDE 'developer' account - good or bad?
- Next message: MADDE 'developer' account - good or bad?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]