[maemo-developers] Package promoting
From: daniel wilms daniel.wilms at nokia.comDate: Wed Sep 22 17:35:34 EEST 2010
- Previous message: Package promoting
- Next message: Package promoting
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 22/09/10 17:28, ext Attila Csipa wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Felipe Crochik <felipe at crochik.com > <mailto:felipe at crochik.com>> wrote: > > We had this discussion not long ago > (http://maemo.org/community/maemo-developers/maemo_qa_process/?org_openpsa_qbpager_net_nemein_discussion_posts_page=1) > > I think the “appdownloader” has most of features we need to help > users find, install, test and review applications. If we also add > to the appdownloader reminders like “you installed xxxx 10 days > ago, how would you rate it?” we would have a much more effective > process. > > > Inevitably, the question will pop-up, why did I made KISStester and > not extend appdownloader or FAP ? I think both projects are excellent > and wish they grow and prosper. BUT. I am really curious if I would > want *that* sort of generic feedback in the testing queue. While > having a separate app for it reduces the potential number of users, > IMO it increases the chances of higher quality/SNR feedback or votes, > meaning that we will be getting votes/comments from people who DID > install the feedback software, it's not something sprung onto them by > a (undoubtedly good, but) generic application installer. My target are > the people who are willing to participate, have at least a rough > understanding what they are getting into. Ideally QA is not about > maximizing number of voters, but SNR. If we gain just a few dozen > regular feedback persons, KISStester already did it's job. > Definitely a valid point. When I was writing the mail before I was as well thinking, if all those features should be placed in the appdownloader, or if that should be a separate app, to not overload it. Many of the improvement wishes for the downloader itself were anyway valid, so that I wanted to start another discussion about it, based on the future plans. I think that a separate testing tool, based on whatever solution, could be better, than overload one app with too many features. But maybe the existing APIs on the server will help there. Daniel -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.maemo.org/pipermail/maemo-developers/attachments/20100922/4164236f/attachment.htm>
- Previous message: Package promoting
- Next message: Package promoting
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]