[maemo-developers] R: R: R: promotion to extras
From: emme750 at gmail.com emme750 at gmail.comDate: Mon Dec 12 21:38:43 EET 2011
- Previous message: R: R: promotion to extras
- Next message: promotion to extras
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
IMHO, the person doing the promoting should become the maintainer. If not that person, then certainly one of the users of the package wants to become the maintainer. A good idea! -----Messaggio originale----- Da: maemo-developers-bounces at maemo.org [mailto:maemo-developers-bounces at maemo.org] Per conto di Michael Cronenworth Inviato: lunedì 12 dicembre 2011 20:25 A: maemo-developers at maemo.org Oggetto: Re: R: R: promotion to extras emme750 at gmail.com wrote: > So, in my opinion, if Supertester have given the green light to these applications, I think it's fair that they be promoted in extras. IMHO, the person doing the promoting should become the maintainer. If not that person, then certainly one of the users of the package wants to become the maintainer. Having maintainer-less packages promoted is irresponsible. IRT the original e-mail, I'm all for dramatically lowering the promotion requirements to a bare minimum. Maemo(MeeGo) is dead. People need to accept it. _______________________________________________ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers at maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.maemo.org/pipermail/maemo-developers/attachments/20111212/93633181/attachment.htm>
- Previous message: R: R: promotion to extras
- Next message: promotion to extras
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]