[maemo-developers] adaptation of Extras QA hurdles
From: Michael Cronenworth mike at cchtml.comDate: Tue Jan 25 17:12:39 EET 2011
- Previous message: adaptation of Extras QA hurdles
- Next message: adaptation of Extras QA hurdles
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Felipe Crochik wrote: <snip> > > A new version of an existing application should have a lower barrier to > promotion than a new application. > Yes. Instead of 10 there should only be 1 required vote. That one vote should not be the developer. No more than 3 votes thought. <snip> > > We could put this into practice by maintaining a list of "trusted" sponsors. > The developer would assign a sponsor to his application using the web site > and this sponsor (as long as it was approved) would make the final decision. > The application would only be promoted after ?two? weeks. Anybody would be > welcome to make comments; vote and test applications on extras and the > sponsor would take them into consideration. Fedora does this, but with such a small community the voting system seems well enough. The 10 vote requirement should just be reduced in half.
- Previous message: adaptation of Extras QA hurdles
- Next message: adaptation of Extras QA hurdles
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]