[maemo-developers] adaptation of Extras QA hurdles
From: Riku Voipio riku.voipio at nokia.comDate: Thu Jan 27 09:40:13 EET 2011
- Previous message: R: adaptation of Extras QA hurdles
- Next message: adaptation of Extras QA hurdles
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 01/25/2011 05:24 PM, ext Andrew Flegg wrote: > On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 15:03, Felipe Crochik <felipe at crochik.com> wrote: >> A new version of an existing application should have a lower barrier to >> promotion than a new application. > It's obvious; but even a minor change can have an enormous impact. > However, it's unlikely that the package (once optified) will become > non-optified and numerous other things (descriptions will only bitrot > when major new features are introduced; icons won't disappear; bug > trackers are fairly persistent etc.) For new versions, the set of checks should still be shorter and less votes needed. Basically the only check to be done is "has the new version any regressions compared to the version already in extras". Riku
- Previous message: R: adaptation of Extras QA hurdles
- Next message: adaptation of Extras QA hurdles
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]