[maemo-developers] adaptation of Extras QA hurdles

[From: Patrick Beck]

Hi,

i have the same problem with my two applications. kfzcheck [1] and
kfzcheck-extras [2]. Because many people don't use extras-testing and
extras-devel. Lots of people haven't seen the apps and can decide if it
can be useful and give feedback to me for improvements.

The two apps are now in testing since four months. I see no chance that
the versions goes ever in extras.

with kind regards

Patrick

[1]http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/kfzcheck/2.5-1/
[2]http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/kfzcheck-extras/0.2-0/

Am Dienstag, den 25.01.2011, 14:57 +0100 schrieb Roman Morawek:
> Hello,
> 
> I like to initiate one more discussion on the Maemo Extras QA process.
> 
> I uploaded a new release of my application
> (http://maemo.org/packages/view/babyphone/) on 5th of November, so more
> than 2.5 months ago. Right now, I have 6 positive votes (including mine)
> - thus 60% of the demanded hurdle. I guess my application is not one of
> the top apps, but downloaded ca. 100.000 times. So I expect it is also
> used and not only positioned in an extreme niche.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
URL: <http://lists.maemo.org/pipermail/maemo-developers/attachments/20110127/2e7b2939/attachment.pgp>