[maemo-developers] Subtle difference in behavior of installation packages
From: gregor herrmann gregor+maemo at comodo.priv.atDate: Wed Feb 8 22:04:26 EET 2012
- Previous message: Subtle difference in behavior of installation packages
- Next message: Subtle difference in behavior of installation packages
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 19:21:16 +0100, Pali Rohár wrote: > > I can install and uninstall the file just fine using the debian package > > I've constructed locally. When installing the app from the Extras-Devel > > repository, however, the application manager can place the file into > > /etc/sudoers.d, but seems unable to remove it when uninstalling. > Try to run apt-get remove <package> in xterm. This is what application manager > doing... Also see error in application manager log. apt-get remove without --purge won't remove conffiles, which would explain why /etc/sudoers.d/foo is still there ... And that's on purpose at least in Debian. If HAM can't be told to purge a package there's not much that can be done (short of using brute force in the postrm maintainer script. Ehh, this sounds ugly.). Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Carole King: Will You Still Love Me Tomorrow -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.maemo.org/pipermail/maemo-developers/attachments/20120208/17ab878a/attachment.pgp>
- Previous message: Subtle difference in behavior of installation packages
- Next message: Subtle difference in behavior of installation packages
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]