[maemo-developers] Subtle difference in behavior of installation packages
From: gregor herrmann gregor+maemo at comodo.priv.atDate: Fri Feb 10 01:30:27 EET 2012
- Previous message: Subtle difference in behavior of installation packages
- Next message: Subtle difference in behavior of installation packages
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:38:53 -0500, John Pietrzak wrote: > >>apt-get remove without --purge won't remove conffiles, which would > >>explain why /etc/sudoers.d/foo is still there ... > >>And that's on purpose at least in Debian. > BTW, what is Debian's purpose on keeping conffiles around? Is there > value in having config info for nonexisting packages? (Should I not > be worried about leaving sudoers files in the sudoers.d directory?) A package might be removed only temporarily or in error, and be reinstalled again later. In that case the admin will be happy to find their carefully tweaked config files instead of having to re-create them from scratch (or grab them from a backup or an older git revision). And in general conffiles lying around in /etc/ don't hurt. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. Homepage: http://info.comodo.priv.at/ - OpenPGP key 0xBB3A68018649AA06 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux user, admin, and developer - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Bruce Springsteen: The Promised Land -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <http://lists.maemo.org/pipermail/maemo-developers/attachments/20120210/83125812/attachment.pgp>
- Previous message: Subtle difference in behavior of installation packages
- Next message: Subtle difference in behavior of installation packages
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]