<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">2006/5/18, Devesh Kothari <<a href="mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org">email@example.com</a>>:<br><br>[skipped]<br><br></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>There has been on the mailing list people who have talked about SB 1.0<br>and there are known cases of maemo rootstraps to work on SB 1.0 but<br>still we havnt officially moved to 1.0 because of above reasons.<br><br>
No body really has put in time to evaluate why to move to SB 1.0<br>(especially since the <a href="http://0.9.8.5">0.9.8.5</a> version works well for our needs, so there<br>is no great significant itch).<br><br>I am not so upto date on all developments, but what would be the major
<br>reason to move to SB 1.0 and what are the impacts if any ?<br><br>Devesh</blockquote><br>One (very strong IMHO) reason could be that legacy scratchbox (0.9.8.x series) doesn't work in a 64 bit environment.<br>As all AMD systems sold today are 64 bit and more and more Linux distributions are released for 64 bit environments, I think that moving to the Scratchbox stable (
1.0.x) series is becoming a priority (always IMHO of course !).<br>I'm using Scratchbox 1.0.1 rc1 for x86_64 architecture (see <a href="http://www.rahkonen.org/projects.html">http://www.rahkonen.org/projects.html</a>) with the latest Maemo release and it seems to be working just fine.