On 24/10/2007, <b class="gmail_sendername">Quim Gil</b> <<a href="mailto:quim.gil@nokia.com">quim.gil@nokia.com</a>> wrote:<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
- Community governance on extras<br>We think the equation would work much better if the maemo community<br>would have control over the extras repository, filtering what has enough<br>quality to be there and what not. Who and how, we are totally open about
<br>this. We consider the Quality Awareness documentation as a reference top<br>define quality. We don't want to give away the control of the repository<br>but we are happy discussing and agreeing with you the rules of a common
<br>game. These rules would include other topics discussed in the past, like<br>i.e. the sections.<br></blockquote></div><br><br>How/who decides what shared libraries and applications get into extras? Voting and popularity has been talked about but what if there is a conflict in a shared library and someone needs to make a call.
<br><br>We need community members to check packages that are propsed for extras, help agree on shared packaged etc. Would something like Ubuntu's membership work?<br><br>Basically something like you demonstrate some involvement with the community and agree to abide by it's rules before you can "join", people can vote to kick you out if there's a problem.
<br><br><a href="http://www.ubuntu.com/community/conduct">http://www.ubuntu.com/community/conduct</a><br><br><br>