<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 25/10/2007, <b class="gmail_sendername">Quim Gil</b> <<a href="mailto:quim.gil@nokia.com">quim.gil@nokia.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
PreS: moving this to maemo-developers since the target is clearly<br>developers.<br><br>On Wed, 2007-10-24 at 17:59 +0000, ext Steve Greenland wrote:<br>> Well, that just means that there would need to be a single BTS for the
<br>> extra repository, which would be a good thing. Expecting users to track<br>> down package specific bug trackers is absurd.<br>><br>> I understand Nokia need to keep a separate repo and BTS for official,<br>
> corporately supported, anything-else-will-make-your-tablet-explode<br>> packages. So the community needs a seperate repo and BTS. But there<br>> needs to be only one of these.<br><br>Well, I don't see as impossible to use an "Extras" product in
<br><a href="http://bugs.maemo.org">bugs.maemo.org</a> clearly identified as third party applications if the<br>extras repository ends up being managed efficiently at a community<br>level.</blockquote><div><br>Will it be possible to link to upstream bugs? Seems like this would be necessary to keep the duplication down to a minimum.
<br></div><br></div><br>