<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 11/27/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Tomi Ollila</b> <<a href="mailto:tomi.ollila@iki.fi">tomi.ollila@iki.fi</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
On Tue 27 Nov 2007 16:27, "Jesse Guardiani" <<a href="mailto:jesse@guardiani.us">jesse@guardiani.us</a>> writes:<br><br>> On 11/27/07, Tomi Ollila <<a href="mailto:tomi.ollila@iki.fi">tomi.ollila@iki.fi
</a>> wrote:<br>><br>> On Mon 26 Nov 2007 22:16, Igor Stoppa <<a href="mailto:igor.stoppa@nokia.com">igor.stoppa@nokia.com</a>> writes:<br>><br>> > What's wrong with something that runs on-demand?
<br>><br>> A separate gui client which starts the server and browser on demand?...but<br>> LISCDNWiOM!! ;)<br>><br>> lol. what? :)<br><br>localhost inet sockets do not work in offline mode.<br><br>Which, btw, is pretty weird (IMHO). I have not seen this behaviour in any
<br>other unix system; results of "ifconfig lo <a href="http://127.0.0.1">127.0.0.1</a>" has preserved over<br>changes in any other interfaces (static and dynamic).<br><br>Why can not the loopback interface be up all the time ??
</blockquote><div><br><br>Yeah, well, I guess that rules out web interfaces for userland applications, eh? shame...<br><br></div></div><br>-- <br>Jesse Guardiani<br>Software Developer / Sys Admin<br><a href="mailto:jesse@guardiani.us">
jesse@guardiani.us</a>