LOL,<br><br>Nathan, yes you have a valid point, getting stuck in dpg hell is a pain, I've never been stuck like I used to under RPM's.<br><br>Maybe we are back to the argument of adding it as an extra?<br><br>Denis<br>
<br clear="all">--------------------------------------<br>sik vis paw kem, para bellum<br>--------------------------------------<br>oderint dum metuant<br>--------------------------------------<br>"Our Country won't go on forever, if we stay soft as we are now. There won't be any AMERICA because some foreign soldiery will invade us and take our women and breed a hardier race!" -LT. GEN. LEWIS "CHESTY" PULLER, USMC<br>
<br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Nathan Summers <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rockwalrus@gmail.com">rockwalrus@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d">On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Denis Dimick <<a href="mailto:dgdimick@gmail.com">dgdimick@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> I'm thinking that aptitude is more like having to drive the Porsche onto a<br>
> flatbed truck, drive the truck where you need to go, and unload the Porsche.<br>
> apt-get, apt-cache and dpkg will so things much faster the loadin Aptitude<br>
> and hunting for the app you want to install, de-install.<br>
<br>
</div>Aptitude has a command-line mode that is almost identical to apt-get<br>
and apt-cache, and the interactive mode has a search feature. But<br>
yes, dpkg is great until you have a lot of dependencies, and apt-get<br>
is great until you have conflicts or would prefer a different<br>
dependency resolution than the one apt-get decides is best. Going<br>
down the food chain even farther, tar xvfz is great until you have<br>
dependencies, and compiling everything from source is great until you<br>
actually need to do something with your computer. :)<br>
<br>
Rockwalrus<br>
</blockquote></div><br>