it will have to be on IOU<br>i have no job, no money, no anything.<br>im actually surprised mrs lcuk let me go at all<br><br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 12:49 PM, Aniello Del Sorbo <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:anidel@gmail.com">anidel@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Apologies will be accepted in Amsterdam along with a bottle of beer :D<br>
<br>
2009/9/24 gary liquid <<a href="mailto:liquid@gmail.com">liquid@gmail.com</a>>:<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5">> please accept huge apologies for spelling of your name Aniello :$<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 12:03 PM, gary liquid <<a href="mailto:liquid@gmail.com">liquid@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> :)<br>
>><br>
>> this has been a good informative discussion.<br>
>> since we are working on beta, can i suggest something.<br>
>><br>
>> anidels point about app feedback *from the device itself* is important.<br>
>><br>
>> if me as a user selects extras testing and installs a an app because<br>
>> anidel said his new version is there<br>
>> from that moment on, it should be the device itself that monitors the<br>
>> process.<br>
>><br>
>> in the same way the crash reporter pops up and asks a question after a<br>
>> crash, can we discuss a path to similar for testing apps?<br>
>> perhaps if the app itself in testing had a flag added to its desktop file<br>
>> (or some other way, a list perhaps *hand waving*)<br>
>> and when the user has run the app they are testing, or 1/2/12/24 hours<br>
>> after installing the user was directly asked<br>
>><br>
>> "what are your feelings on this app?"<br>
>><br>
>> it would give control directly to the testers and remove the disconnect<br>
>> that currently occurs - I for one have major problems maintaining a big long<br>
>> list of places and sites and things I should look for and the packages list<br>
>> overwhelms me with multiple versions and complex filenames which mean<br>
>> nothing to me as a user.<br>
>> the app is installed on my tablet, it is a computer, it knows the version,<br>
>> it knows the url path - i can give valuable feedback there and then.<br>
>><br>
>> i dont know how practical or complex an app of this nature would be, but<br>
>> we have enough toolkits and developers around who might help code something<br>
>> up.<br>
>> it should even go through extras-testing itself!<br>
>><br>
>> gary<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Aniello Del Sorbo <<a href="mailto:anidel@gmail.com">anidel@gmail.com</a>><br>
>> wrote:<br>
>>><br>
>>> 2009/9/24 Andre Klapper <<a href="mailto:aklapper@openismus.com">aklapper@openismus.com</a>>:<br>
>>> > Am Donnerstag, den 24.09.2009, 11:48 +0100 schrieb Aniello Del Sorbo:<br>
>>> >> My only complaint is on who has the final word.<br>
>>> ><br>
>>> > Again: It is the package maintainer, after his/her package has been<br>
>>> > given 10 karma points by testers.<br>
>>> ><br>
>>> > andre<br>
>>> > --<br>
>>> > Andre Klapper (<a href="http://maemo.org" target="_blank">maemo.org</a> bugmaster)<br>
>>> ><br>
>>><br>
>>> Thus I guess we need to work on what those testers should work.<br>
>>> Is this being done?<br>
>>><br>
>>> And what about the second part of the proposal?<br>
>>><br>
>>> --<br>
>>> anidel<br>
>>> Sent from London, Eng, United Kingdom<br>
>>> _______________________________________________<br>
>>> maemo-developers mailing list<br>
>>> <a href="mailto:maemo-developers@maemo.org">maemo-developers@maemo.org</a><br>
>>> <a href="https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers" target="_blank">https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers</a><br>
>><br>
><br>
><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</div></div>--<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
--<br>
anidel<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br>