Welcome to the club :) I have the same problem.<br><br>Regards:<br>Bundyo<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Nathan Anderson <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:nathan@andersonsplace.net">nathan@andersonsplace.net</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Devs,<br>
<br>
Ok, I have been trying to be a good boy and optify all the items I<br>
have been putting into the fremantle extras. Up to now they have been<br>
standalone libraries and the build bots have done their job and optified the<br>
package (and then I've been able to install them in my sdk properly).<br>
<br>
However, I have finally submitted a library which depends on two<br>
other libraries that I did and optified. Well when it did the depends step<br>
to pull all the libraries; this is the output:<br>
<br>
---<br>
Try to install static depends: libcurl3 libcurl3-dev libicu42 libicu42-dev<br>
clucene-core clucene-core-dev zlib1g-dev python2.5 python2.5-dev<br>
[2009-10-21 12:30:46] fakeroot apt-get -y -q -o<br>
APT::Get::AllowUnauthenticated=1 install --no-remove libcurl3 libcurl3-dev<br>
libicu42 libicu42-dev clucene-core clucene-core-dev zlib1g-dev python2.5<br>
python2.5-dev </dev/null<br>
.... (My depends are listed properly) ....<br>
Unpacking libssl0.9.8 (from .../libssl0.9.8_0.9.8g-15maemo4+0m5_armel.deb)<br>
...<br>
Selecting previously deselected package libreadline4.<br>
Unpacking libreadline4 (from .../libreadline4_4.3-10.1+0m5_armel.deb) ...<br>
Selecting previously deselected package clucene-core.<br>
Unpacking clucene-core (from .../clucene-core_0.9.21b-0maemo1_armel.deb) ...<br>
dpkg: error processing<br>
/var/cache/apt/archives/clucene-core_0.9.21b-0maemo1_armel.deb (--unpack):<br>
trying to overwrite `/opt', which is also in package base-files<br>
^^^^<br>
Uhm, this is not good. Each of my "optified" packages throws this error.<br>
That kinda makes optifing the libraries a pointless exercise if I can't use<br>
them later in the buildbot. And Lib-icu is about 16 MEGS of libraries, so I<br>
would think it would be a great canidate for optification. Do I need to<br>
resubmit everything w/o optification, or are the build bots broken?<br>
<br>
The packages that I have optified has depends on maemo-optify and has<br>
"maemo-optify" as the step between (dh_gencontrol and dh_md5sums).<br>
<br>
dh_gencontrol<br>
maemo-optify<br>
dh_md5sums<br>
<br>
What do I need to do to solve this issue? I have no issues resubmitting<br>
the packages I have done again to test things, but I would rather have a<br>
"known" way to make it work since Lib-icu is a 2.5 hour (yes, 2 hours 30<br>
minutes) build process on the builders; so if I would prefer not to have to<br>
tie up a buildbot for that length of time again until we have a known<br>
working solution.<br>
<br>
Nathan.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
maemo-developers mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:maemo-developers@maemo.org">maemo-developers@maemo.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers" target="_blank">https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br>