Why not simply telling "minor release update" whenever the version upgrade is in the epoch part only?<br><br>Luca Donaggio<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 4:15 PM, David Greaves <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:david@dgreaves.com">david@dgreaves.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="im">On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 13:20 +0000, Andrew Flegg wrote:<br>
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 12:55, Graham Cobb <<a href="mailto:g%2B770@cobb.uk.net">g+770@cobb.uk.net</a>> wrote:<br>
> > On Friday 30 October 2009 11:44:17 Juha Kallioinen wrote:<br>
> >> And a perfectly good one too! :) It's useful not to change the upstream<br>
> >> package version too much so that it's easier to see that a package could<br>
> >> use updating.<br>
> ><br>
> > I agree with all Juha's points (but I would, wouldn't I!).<br>
><br>
> Simplest solution I can see, whilst still giving the user some<br>
> indication of version number (3.4.1 tells you something over 0.0.1):<br>
> the Application Manager only shows things of the form (\d+)(\.\d+)*?<br>
><br>
> So, the example of 2.0.0+cvs20040908+mp4v2+bmp-0ubuntu6maemo1 would<br>
> just appear as 2.0.0 in the view.<br>
<br>
</div>/me would be confused.<br>
<br>
Why is it upgrading 2.0.0 to 2.0.0 *again* ?<br>
<br>
David<br>
(Who presumably wouldn't see the -local_bugfix1 and -local_bugfix2<br>
suffixes)<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
maemo-developers mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:maemo-developers@maemo.org">maemo-developers@maemo.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers" target="_blank">https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>