Anyway, the pressing problem I have now is what should I do with my app? I had to use Qt Mobility to be able to detect Offline mode and other network issues I had with QA (which at least I can't find documented anywhere... I think it would be nice to know what the QA wants beforehand). Now they are telling me that I should "<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; border-collapse: collapse; ">manually package the Qt Mobility package" with my app, but I have no idea what this means and how should I do that. Does anyone have any suggestions?</span><div>
<font class="Apple-style-span" face="arial, sans-serif"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: collapse;"><br></span></font></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" face="arial, sans-serif"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: collapse;">Cheers,</span></font></div>
<div><font class="Apple-style-span" face="arial, sans-serif"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: collapse;"><br></span></font></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" face="arial, sans-serif"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: collapse;">Sascha<br>
</span></font><div><br></div><div><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 18:10, Attila Csipa <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:maemo@csipa.in.rs">maemo@csipa.in.rs</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im">On Wednesday 21 July 2010 16:52:16 you wrote:<br>
> This means application won't work without having connection after<br>
> installation and I guess Qvi Store QA is good enough to find that and<br>
> reject the application. Moreover, you would need root permissions to<br>
<br>
</div>? Requiring network connectivity on it's own cannot be a disqualifying cause.<br>
That would mean you could not publish even a twitter client.<br>
<div class="im"><br>
> install additional packages, so apparently there is need to modify sudoers<br>
> settings, which may be seen as security breakage. If all these succeed I<br>
> would be surprised.<br>
<br>
</div>Again, there is a huge number of uses that might legitimately require sudoer<br>
functionality (like for example for handling low-level network related<br>
things, think Joikuspot, WiFi-Eye, etc).<br>
<br>
IMHO the only rejection clause might be policy violation, not a technical<br>
one - unless 'non-cludgy' and 'non-hacky' are official technical criteria :)<br>
(in fact, it would be cool to see what *exactly* the Qt Ovi QA requirements<br>
are, not just generic descriptions - if someone has a link, I'd be grateful).<br>
In some super-fantasy scenario, Extras and Ovi should have fairly overlapping<br>
QA criteria.<br>
<br>
<br>
Best regards,<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5">Attila<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
maemo-developers mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:maemo-developers@maemo.org">maemo-developers@maemo.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers" target="_blank">https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div>