[maemo-users] Nokia device usage
From: Matt Emson memsom at interalpha.co.ukDate: Sat Mar 7 15:06:58 EET 2009
- Previous message: Nokia device usage
- Next message: Nokia device usage
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
See online reply. Sent from my iPhone On 7 Mar 2009, at 02:08, Fernando Cassia <fcassia at gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 7:37 PM, John Holmblad > <jholmblad at acadiasecurenets.com> wrote: >> >> I for one would like to see Apple acquire Nokia. That would be a >> great >> combination. > > A couple points: > > 1. Apple makes proprietary, closed solutions. Try to reverse engineer > Apple´s firmware for compatibility reasons and you´ll see Apple > lawyers coming to get you. You don't need to. This is the point. There are only two types of people that need to do tho : 1) people who don't want Apple hardware but want Apple Software, 2) iPhone users Who cant live in the sade world Apple created. > > > 2. Apple makes expensive, not cheap, hardware. This is a misconception Apple makes expensive hardware that is well specified. Apple does not cater to PC builder types. > > > 3. Apple does not support Free Software in general > (if you know any Apple software released under the GNU GPL Free > Software license, let me know) > that puts it at odds with the N8xx tablets Linux OS foundation. Free software does not require GPL. > > 4. Apple continues pretending Linux doesn´t exist (Quicktime for Lin > ux, anyone). Lots of companies ignore Linux. It's not an Apple exclusive. > > > 5. Apple charges an arm and a leg for software upgrades No, no it doesn't. Apple charges for major releases. But point releases (eg. Ubuntu 8.04 to 8.10) are free. 10.4 to 10.5 was a major release. Microsoft charges way more for the same type of upgrade. > > > 6. Apple doesn´t like people tinkering with its OS. There's not a lot you need to tinker with. It just works. > > > 7. Apple is just a Microsoft with a sense of style. > There´s plenty of "not invented here syndrome", like Microsoft does > with WMV, Apple does with Quicktime. Why not embrace OpenOffice.org? > Not invented at Apple, so it must suck, right?. Because Apple have iWork, which is pretty much better that OpenOffice for most users. > > > So please don´t. I wouldn´t buy any device from Apple corp. Apple Corp is the Beatles record label, isn't it? Each to their own. > > FC > >> not do acquisitions and they have never been good at it. >> >> >> Best Regards, >> >>
- Previous message: Nokia device usage
- Next message: Nokia device usage
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]