[maemo-users] Dealing with N900 responsiveness (or lack of thereof)
From: Dawid Lorenz adl at adl.plDate: Tue Apr 20 18:52:20 EEST 2010
- Previous message: ussd-widget
- Next message: Dealing with N900 responsiveness (or lack of thereof)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On 22 February 2010 16:43, Dawid Lorenz <adl at adl.pl> wrote: > > Other thing I've noticed is system swappiness value, which is 100 by > default. What I've learned [2] is that 100 value favours moving stuff to > swap space quite frequently, which makes some sort of sense with > experience I've got. I have rebooted my N900 today and set swappiness value > to 60 by *echo 60 > /proc/sys/vm/swappiness*, however I am not sure > whether that's right way of setting this (article refers to > /etc/sysctl.conf file which simply doesn't exists in my rootfs, or perhaps > is stored elsewhere). Anyway, I am going to observe how system overall > performance evolves over next couple of days. I'd like to follow-up on this a little. Basically, after nearly two months since launching this thread and moving my N900 into much lower swappiness value (I currently have 30), frankly I can't see much difference. What usually happens is that after few days of overall performance gets horribly undermined, probably due to more and more things getting into swap space. Sometimes I struggle to take a call, just because screen doesn't really catch up on time. Utterly frustrating, so in order to remain sane, I simply have to reboot the device, just in order to "refresh" memory. Not very convenient. Anyway, I've seen a suggestion on one of the blogs [1] that there's a possibility to force certain applications to run with very low nice level, which allegedly should make them h(sn-)appier. The comment poster also suggests the possibility of making some processes never get into swap space. Unfortunately I didn't hear from him, so I don't know the details, hence asking here - is that possible at all? Anyone here tried that kind of tricks and could shed some light on the case? Well, any suggestions in regards to coping with not-that-excellent N900 performance are more than welcome. Thanks! [1] http://danielwould.wordpress.com/2010/04/02/why-my-next-smartphone-will-probably-be-running-android-confessions-of-a-nokia-fanboy/#comment-422 -- Dawid 'evad' Lorenz * http://adl.pl null://google 'no evil' mail has taken away my random signatures -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.maemo.org/pipermail/maemo-users/attachments/20100420/d197cff0/attachment.htm>
- Previous message: ussd-widget
- Next message: Dealing with N900 responsiveness (or lack of thereof)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]