On 2/6/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Michael Wiktowy</b> <<a href="mailto:michael.wiktowy@gmail.com">michael.wiktowy@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
I wouldn't have bought a 770 or a N800 if it had a GSM/3G/Super-duper<br>next-gen phone built in.</blockquote><div><br>Me neither <br></div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
- I already have a bare-bones cell phone that makes calls just fine<br>... most people have<br>...</blockquote><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
- It would tie it to some specific technology that doesn't have the<br>longevity/compatibility of wifi/BT<br></blockquote></div><br>GSM in the N800 would be cool for interweb, but this thing is horribly designed for a phone. It would only work well with a headset, and we all saw how the Palm Tungsten W flopped.
<br><br>Phones like Treos and the upcomming iPhone have screen too small for browsing, but make decent phones. Other phones make great phones. I'd rather have a great phone and a great tablet.<br><br>I'm just looking for a small, barebones phone that has bluetooth.
<br>