<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2009/11/30 Mark Haury <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:wolfmane@gmail.com">wolfmane@gmail.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im">Qole wrote:<br>
><br>
><br>
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 7:07 AM, Jeffrey Mark Siskind <<a href="mailto:qobi@purdue.edu">qobi@purdue.edu</a><br>
</div><div class="im">> <mailto:<a href="mailto:qobi@purdue.edu">qobi@purdue.edu</a>>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> This could be a showstopper for me<br>
> as it would break my central use case. And I would need to cancel<br>
> my order and<br>
> consider buying something else (like a Pandora, Netwalker, or M1/M2).<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> I too would like to see full keyboard support in Maemo 5.<br>
><br>
> But why the threats to buy a competing device? Are you hoping to scare<br>
> someone into fixing this?<br>
><br>
</div>It's merely a reminder that consumers need devices that work, and work<br>
the way _they_ want them to, not the way that some narrow-minded<br>
developer thinks they should work. Consumers are going to go elsewhere<br>
in droves if the major shortcomings of the N900 are not addressed. Of<br>
course, a few of those are hardware, so you've lost a bunch already...<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
Mark<br>
</font><div><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br> </div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Then let the markets decide it instead of your speculation, markets are always right unlike persons.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Ossipena/Timo</div></div>