<div>that's why people must know what they are buying <strong>before</strong> really buying the product. if no 3g is dealbreaker, then it is.<br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Ossipena</div><div><br></div><div>
<br></div><div class="gmail_quote">2009/12/9 Alejandro López <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:listas.apl@googlemail.com">listas.apl@googlemail.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im"><br>
<br>
Attila Csipa wrote:<br>
> On Wednesday 09 December 2009 11:18:38 Alejandro López wrote:<br>
</div><div class="im">> Let's not get carried away. As I understood the situation, the N900 works on<br>
> all providers in the USA, the question being the tech level (=speed)<br>
> supported on a particular provider. Yes, we'd certainly all like to see 3.5G<br>
> as our connection icon, but let's not equate 'not optimum use case scenario'<br>
> with 'useless'.<br>
<br>
</div>There you got a point.<br>
<br>
However, if you buy a (quite expensive) 3G device and when you try to use it you found out that it will not work on 3G, wouldn't you be disappointed?<br>
<br>
And when I say "you find out", I actually mean millions of people in North and South America. Isn't this ridiculous?<br>
</blockquote></div><br>