<div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Rick B. <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rabil@clear.net">rabil@clear.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div><div></div><div class="h5">On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 10:11 +0100, Luca Donaggio wrote:<br>
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 9:26 PM, Paul Hartman <paul.hartman<br>
> +<a href="mailto:maemo@gmail.com">maemo@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Rick B. <<a href="mailto:rabil@clear.net">rabil@clear.net</a>><br>
> wrote:<br>
> > On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 10:24 -0600, Paul Hartman wrote:<br>
> >> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Nils Faerber<br>
> >> <<a href="mailto:nils.faerber@kernelconcepts.de">nils.faerber@kernelconcepts.de</a>> wrote:<br>
> >> > Hello!<br>
> >> > I *love* FCam and FCamera - already as they are. The<br>
> nearest thing to a<br>
> >> > real camera for a mobile.<br>
> >> ><br>
> >> > So I went off and took some pictures and today for the<br>
> first time loaded<br>
> >> > them onto my PC and recognised they are all "just"<br>
> 640x480!?<br>
> >> ><br>
> >> > So I tried to find the resolution setting in FCamera but<br>
> there was none.<br>
> >> ><br>
> >> > Is there a way to have the full 5MP in FCamera?<br>
> >> ><br>
> >> > I would be pretty disappointed if this wasn't possible...<br>
> >> ><br>
> >> > Pressing thumbs!<br>
> >><br>
> >> I remember reading some discussion of this, and the<br>
> explanation that<br>
> >> it's not actually 640x480, but some applications are<br>
> reading it wrong.<br>
> >> Something like this. :)<br>
> >><br>
> >> What is the filesize? You should be able to figure out the<br>
> resolution<br>
> >> roughly from that. If it's truly 640x480 the file should be<br>
> less than<br>
> >> 1 megabyte I think. If it's full-sized then it should be<br>
> closer to 10.<br>
> >> _______________________________________________<br>
> >> maemo-users mailing list<br>
> >> <a href="mailto:maemo-users@maemo.org">maemo-users@maemo.org</a><br>
> >> <a href="https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users" target="_blank">https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users</a><br>
> ><br>
> ><br>
> > If memory serves, FCamera use dng format. I've not found any<br>
> maemo or<br>
> > linux software that allows one to view dng format images in<br>
> their full<br>
> > resolution.<br>
><br>
><br>
> I think UFraw should be able to handle DNG. (maybe in Easy<br>
> Debian if<br>
> there's not a proper maemo version)<br>
><br>
> Otherwise try it on a Mac or Windows machine with a recent<br>
> release of<br>
> Photoshop...<br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> maemo-users mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:maemo-users@maemo.org">maemo-users@maemo.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users" target="_blank">https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users</a><br>
><br>
><br>
> .... OR you can use MRAWViewer on the N900 itself (though you need to<br>
> enable extras-devel to get the latest version which support FCamera<br>
> DNGs).<br>
><br>
> --<br>
> Luca Donaggio<br>
</div></div>> ___________________________________<br>
<br>
<br>
I tried shotwell and ufraw under Ubuntu 10.04. Both support dng and<br>
worked with images downloaded from the Internet but neither would work<br>
with the Fcamera dng's. I will try MRAWViewer from extras-devel at the<br>
first opportunity.<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
maemo-users mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:maemo-users@maemo.org">maemo-users@maemo.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users" target="_blank">https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br>Were the DNGs from a recent FCamera's version? Old versions of FCamera produced corrupted DNGs.<br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Luca Donaggio<br>