[maemo-developers] Any problem with chinhook beta repo?

From: Luca Donaggio donaggio at gmail.com
Date: Thu Nov 8 18:12:11 EET 2007
On Nov 8, 2007 4:04 PM, Gabriel Schulhof <gabriel.schulhof at nokia.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 15:14 +0100, ext Luca Donaggio wrote:
> > It seems that my sbox target is somewhat misconfigured: it should look
> > in binary-armel subdir on repository.maemo.org, not binary-arm, but I
> > don't have any clue why it happened and how to correct it!
> IIRC, there is a certain combination of scratchbox parameters
> (especially the emulation and/or debkits) that results in the package
> management system thinking that it's on arm rather than armel. I believe
> the fix is to use the correct emulation and/or debkits.
> Gabriel

Thanks Gabriel!
Any clue about how to fix it? I followed these instructions to set up
my sbox environment:


My current parameters for chinhook-armel target (via sb-menu -> show) are:

Compiler:         cs2005q3.2-glibc2.5-arm
Architecture:     arm
Sub-architecture: arm
C-library:        glibc
Devkits:          cputransp debian doctools perl debian-sarge
CPU-transparency: /scratchbox/devkits/cputransp/bin/qemu-arm-0.8.1-sb2

Apart from the compiler glibc version and debian-sarge among the
devkits, they are the same for my bora-armel target, which works just
fine (no arm/armel mismatch)!

More information about the maemo-developers mailing list