[maemo-developers] Any problem with chinhook beta repo?

From: Eero Tamminen eero.tamminen at nokia.com
Date: Wed Nov 14 19:13:58 EET 2007

ext Luca Donaggio wrote:
> On Nov 8, 2007 4:04 PM, Gabriel Schulhof <gabriel.schulhof at nokia.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 2007-11-08 at 15:14 +0100, ext Luca Donaggio wrote:
>>> It seems that my sbox target is somewhat misconfigured: it should look
>>> in binary-armel subdir on repository.maemo.org, not binary-arm, but I
>>> don't have any clue why it happened and how to correct it!
>> IIRC, there is a certain combination of scratchbox parameters
>> (especially the emulation and/or debkits) that results in the package
>> management system thinking that it's on arm rather than armel. I believe
>> the fix is to use the correct emulation and/or debkits.
> Any clue about how to fix it? I followed these instructions to set up
> my sbox environment:
> http://inz.fi/blog/2007/10/22/multi-target-development-for-maemo/
> My current parameters for chinhook-armel target (via sb-menu -> show) are:
> Compiler:         cs2005q3.2-glibc2.5-arm
> Architecture:     arm
> Sub-architecture: arm
> C-library:        glibc
> Devkits:          cputransp debian doctools perl debian-sarge
> CPU-transparency: /scratchbox/devkits/cputransp/bin/qemu-arm-0.8.1-sb2
> Apart from the compiler glibc version and debian-sarge among the
> devkits, they are the same for my bora-armel target, which works just
> fine (no arm/armel mismatch)!

For Chinook debian-sarge should be debian-etch.


More information about the maemo-developers mailing list