[maemo-developers] (Fremantle) libqt4-core vs libqtcore4

From: Alex Myodov amyodov at gmail.com
Date: Wed Oct 7 15:34:04 EEST 2009
Maybe, an opposite direction package (libqtcore4 that depends on
libqt4-core) should be added then for compatibility, shouldn't it?

Anyway, seems strange to have a different convention for the similar
(4.5) versions in Diablo and Fremantle.

Antonio Aloisio wrote:
> Hi,
> Maybe because having libqt4-<Qt Module> is logic and clean.
> Note: I'm not the maintainer of these packages.
> Br,
> Antonio
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Alex Myodov <amyodov at gmail.com
> <mailto:amyodov at gmail.com>> wrote:
>     Hello,
>     I recently noticed that Freemantle SDK contains the QT packages with
>     outdated naming scheme only; libqt4-core package is available and stores
>     the libraries. Though Debian (as well as Diablo SDK, as the people
>     confirmed on IRC) has the new scheme, where the libraries are stored in
>     libqtcore4 while libqt4-core being the transitional package and having
>     the "depends" on libqtcore4.
>     Is anyone aware of any obscure reasons for that, and may/will it change
>     in Freemantle to be compliant with the other packages?

More information about the maemo-developers mailing list