[maemo-developers] Is mauku open source, i.e free or is in non-free?
From: Henrik Hedberg henrik.hedberg at innologies.fiDate: Tue Jan 26 23:07:57 EET 2010
- Previous message: Is mauku open source, i.e free or is in non-free?
- Next message: Is mauku open source, i.e free or is in non-free?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jeremiah Foster wrote:
> Bug #7505 asks if mauku is open or closed. According to the bug report, it looks pretty closed.
...
> What should we do here? Move this to non-free?
Mauku 2.0 is not free as open source software (Mauku 0.x was under
GPL). It is mainly based on Microfeed library written by me and licensed
under LGPL, but the application itself is not licensed under any OSI
compliant license.
I am very aware of the meaning "free" here. Mauku was uploaded into
the free section because there was (is) no non-free repository in
Extras. However, the community insisted to close all external
repositories and use Extras instead (done that). In addition, Ovi Store
was not (is not, it is still beta) available for distribution channel.
Last time I saw someone mentioning something about the non-free
section in Extras, there were opinions that (some?) members of the
community do not want to spend their time doing QA for non-free
software. As far as I know, that was the end of the discussion. There
have not been any discussion, announcements or instructions how to
really handle QA in the non-free section.
My opinion is that QA in the non-free section should work as it is
working in the free section currently. In most cases, testers are doing
their work without really reviewing the source code. The same criteria
could be applied for non-free software. If there are community members
wanting to support and use non-free software in their devices, they
should be given a change to do that.
My humble intention was to provide my software for Maemo users (and
maemo.org members) through the channel they are aware and in a way that
should cause least problems. Feel free to remove it (completely, please,
in that case) or move to non-free section in Extras (not in extras-devel
or extras-testing) and provide a guidance how to upgrade it later.
Naturally, the latter is better.
BR,
Henrik (author of Mauku)
P.S. I have been very busy lately, and I have had to make decisions
how to spend my time. Unfortunately, the confusion and unreadiness of
Maemo (and maemo.org) software distribution channels was one reason why
I have dropped the priority of Mauku project. Those essential building
blocks should be in good shape in order to attract developers (both open
source and commercial), but unfortunately that is not the case here now.
I really hope things will be get better...
--
Henrik Hedberg - http://www.henrikhedberg.net/
- Previous message: Is mauku open source, i.e free or is in non-free?
- Next message: Is mauku open source, i.e free or is in non-free?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
