[hafqa] [hafqa] [Bug 630] Increased Bugzilla transparency - get the developers involved!

[From: bugzilla-daemon at maemo.org]

https://maemo.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=630





------- Additional Comments From ferenc at maemo.org  2006-09-16 02:04 -------
Guys, why the hell we just do not explain things instead of doing this silly
fights behind the curtains? 

We needed "maemo qa", because the team -who was busy implementing the 770
software- could not handle all the bugs over here. There is an other team -I am
member of that; taking care of maemo SDKs, the web services, public repos etc-
who decided to introduce "maemo qa" until the real development team will free up
resources and can assign someone for each software component.

There are two guys behind "maemo qa". One of them is active and investigating
every single report people file here and tries to find the best person inside
Nokia, who will proceed with the bug. The other one is myself, who is really
lazy, just observing stuff from a distance, but will stand behind the current
process as long as it lasts. So I hope  the "personalization" of "maemo qa" can
be considered done with this. I take all the blames, my colleague takes care of
the real job.

I know, we know that there is an issue with handling bugs over here. We -inside
Nokia- have more hands now to take care of these, so hope that the situation
will change for the better. See Luc's comment on HAF stuff.

Until you see an improvement in the error management process and want to blame
"maemo QA" just send mails to me (me != /dev/null, I promise).



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://maemo.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.