[maemo-community] Explaining karma
From: Sebastian 'CrashandDie' Lauwers crashanddie at gmail.comDate: Thu Aug 14 16:23:15 EEST 2008
- Previous message: Explaining karma
- Next message: Explaining karma
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Dave Neary <dneary at maemo.org> wrote: > Most > civilisations have a minimum age requirement for voting in elections > because children are not considered to have sufficient life experience > to make that decision. In free software communities, new members are not > considered full card-carrying members straight away, for the same > reason. There is a culture to maintain. And allowing anyone to vote is > not democracy at work, it is mob rule. Yes, indeed, there is a minimum age to vote, but there is no minimum IQ, no minimum education needed to vote. And rightfully so. > I want the council to represent doers in the maemo community, not the > ranks of observers out there who don't really contribute to improving > things in any meaningful way. I agree, but aren't these observers part of those who will be able to issue the most solid vote ? > I agree with you that we need to improve how we measure contributions, > but doing away with any measurement on the grounds that it's > "democratic" is not something I want to do. I understand, but any arbitrary rule to classify mob from legal voters will create problems. I thought karma never meant anything else than an e-peen enhancer. I was wrong. Or maybe, I was exceptionally right. S. -- question = ( to ) ? be : ! be; -- Wm. Shakespeare
- Previous message: Explaining karma
- Next message: Explaining karma
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]